Being a vegan doesn’t mean eating only vegetables. In fact, the vegan philosophy is openly against cruelty to animals and their exploitation. That explains why vegans don’t eat meat, fish, eggs, dairy, or honey. However, the industry today adds so many different ingredients to its products that many vegans want to know if the food they buy is free of animal ingredients. “Is bread vegan, for example, is one of the questions I hear most often.
The subject does not cease to have its crumb, because if you go over its basic ingredients, bread is just flour, water, salt, and yeast. In that order of things, bread is vegan. The problem starts with the things that are added to it. I say this because I see the bread that has eggs, butter, milk, buttermilk, casein, jelly, royal jelly or honey, all of which are of animal origin.
The Folexin is helped to make together with natural ingredients and is used to maintain the development of organic hair. Folexin is a hair care product created from national and international organic ingredients that induce hair development. Folexin is created in an FDA registered facility as well as up to date with GMP standards.
Of course, the lists of ingredients that come in the packaging of branded bread let you know if the one we buy is vegan or not. However, the ones you buy from traditional bakeries don’t usually carry labels, so you can’t find out about their ingredients, so it’s important to always go to reliable bakeries, where the bread they sell carry only what they say they do! Having said that, even the ingredients that the labels on branded bread that we believe to be vegan are not always free from guilt. These are two suspicious ingredients:
Mono and diglycerides. Mono and diglycerides. These are fats that are used as emulsifiers to make bread fluffy and improve their texture. They are usually derived from soy, but can also come from animal fats.
Lecithin: It is another emulsifier that is almost always derived from soybeans, although it also comes from egg yolks.
To be absolutely sure that the bread you eat is vegan, nothing like making it yourself at home. These ideas can help you prepare different pieces of bread, to suit the consumer:
You can replace eggs with chia seeds or oat flakes: for each egg, 1 tablespoon of chia seeds or 1 tablespoon of oat flakes. Mix the chosen spoonful with a little warm water until it acquires the consistency of gelatine.
Instead of butter, you can use AOVE.
Instead of cow’s milk, you can use almond milk.
If you want to make a sweet bread, you can use maple syrup.
Just add the above ingredients to the bread dough (in the same amounts as in the traditional recipe), to get the vegan bread you want.
Do you spend more than 120 minutes a week in parks, forests, the mountains, the countryside or the beach? Well, you do great, because people who do are much more likely to be healthy, both physically and mentally, than those who never go out in the wild.
This has been proven by a University of Exeter study of some 20,000 people funded by the UK Health Service (NIHR), recently published in Scientific Reports. The subject has aroused so much interest that I have seen it commented on in all the major international media, whether in the press, radio, television or on the Internet.
I know it’s not new. If you follow this blog, you will have seen how much I talk about the benefits of living outdoors, including reducing the risk of depression and overweight, not to mention the health of your arteries and less exposure to air pollution.
What’s so innovative about the British study? That it’s the first time science has set a “minimum of nature hours” per week. Moreover, you don’t have to travel to the coast, the countryside or the mountains to complete those 120 minutes, because that nature time also applies to the time you spend in parks and other urban green spaces.
“You can complete those two hours in one go or by adding up minutes of life in nature areas every day, the important thing is the total,” adds Dr. Mat White, director of the work, who explains that they took their data from the British survey Commitment to the Natural Environment, the largest ever conducted in the world on people’s contact with nature.
“There are lots of studies that explain why spending time in the natural environment is good for health and well-being,” insists Professor Terry Hartig of Uppsala University (Sweden) and co-author of the paper. “I would like to add that living more in nature environments improves one’s perspective on life, reduces stress and allows for quality time, both alone and with friends and family… The value of this new study is that it offers concrete recommendations on the nature time we need. We believe it can help people to be more aware of it.